Current Indian Status
Resistance to insecticides was monitored either through
Discriminating dose assays ( use of a single dose that kills 99 % individuals
of a susceptible strain ) to indicate per cent resistant individuals
in a field population or through log dose probit assays to derive the
LD50 which indicates the dose required to kill 50 % individuals in a
population. The LD50 of the field population is then compared to that
of the susceptible strain and expressed as resistance in x fold. Resistance
to pyrethroids continues to be high with levels of 108 to 7220 fold
in almost all parts of the country. Earlier Armes et al., (1996) had
reported resistance factors of 5 - 6500 fold to pyrethroids in field
populations of Helicoverpa collected from all parts of the country.
Pyrethroid resistance is wide spread in India, at high levels in Maharashtra,
Punjab, AP and Tamilnadu Resistance levels during the entire season
are usually high with minor exceptions during early cotton season and
appear to be independent of the pyrethroid use pattern ( Kranthi et
al., 1997 ). The problem is still most severe in the coastal belt of
AP. When used alone pyrethroids are no longer excepted to be effective
against Helicoverpa except on larvae less than second instar stage.
However, resistance assays carried out against the pink bollworm and
spotted bollworm indicated that these were still susceptible to pyrethroids.
Pyrethroid resistance levels during 1993 - 99 have been high all over
India. In most parts of the country, survival frequencies to that discriminating
dose of cypermethrin 0.1 ug are still found to be 95 - 100 %. Despite
the steady decline in the preference for pyrethroids in cotton pest
management over the past two - three years, resistance to pyrethroids
does not appear to be on the decline. The '93 - '99 data on 'in - season'
changes in pyrethroid resistance at all centres, however, indicates
that resistance levels were relatively lower during the cotton season
( October - November for A.P., Coimbatore and Maharashtra and August
- September for North ). This information supports the idea that pyrethroids
could still be used on cotton against Helicoverpa infestation during
the period mentioned above. This could as well be meaningful for better
utilization of these compounds as the pyrethroid application during
this time also coincides with the early infestation of the pink bollworm.
|
IRM in cotton pests in 'a nut shell'
- Cultivate
'sucking pest tolerant' cultivars and/or seed treatment
- Zero
insecticide till 60 days
- Based
on economic threshold the following simple ' window strategy
can be adopted
- No
'organophosphate' till 90 days
- Endosulfan
- not beyond 90 days
- Biorationals
eg: HaNPV, neem,etc'if applicable' at 70-90 days
- Pyrethroid
only after 110days
source
: Sustainable Cotton pest management through IRM, CICR tech bull
no.1/1999
|
Resistance to Endosulfan was found to be 1 - 14 fold in the field populations
tested. Armes et al., (1996) had reported resistance factors of 2 -
28 fold and suggested that field control failures could be caused due
to resistance factors as low as 5 -1 0 fold. Seasonal averages of resistance
to endosulfan have been very high throughout '93 - '99 at Coimbatore
(45 - 57 %), Guntur (47-67 %) and Nagpur (40 - 46 %), but relatively
low in Rangareddy district (29-35%) and parts of Punjab and Haryana
(15 - 20 %). However a closer look at the dynamics of resistance for
all seasons of '93-'99 reveals that, at all the monitoring sites
( except Coimbatore ), resistance to endosulfan has been low (20 - 25
%) at the beginning of cropping season and generally increases to about
40 - 50 % by the end of November when spraying on cotton ceases. At
Coimbatore resistance to endosulfan appears stable at about 45 - 50
% (with minor exceptions) throughout the season during all the years.
Hence endosulfan is being recommended as an early season insecticide.
Resistance to quinalphos was found to be low to moderate at 1 - 29
fold, for the field populations collected recently during '98-'99. Resistance
was higher in the coastal belt of Andhra Pradesh and some pockets of
Central India. Earlier quinalphos resistance has not been reported to
exceed 2 - 9 fold in field populations ( Armes et al., 1996 ). Resistance
to quinalphos has been high at Guntur (45 - 66 %) and Coimbatore (44
- 48 %), but low (about 20 - 25 %) in Punjab, Rangareddy and Nagpur.
It was also observed that resistance levels to Ops and endosulfan increase
in the season depending on the use of these compounds. Organophosphates
such as quinalphos, chlopyriphos and profenophos can be used during
the peak reproductive phase of the crop.
Resistance to menthomyl was 1 - 22 fold, with higher levels in the
coastal belt of Andhra Pradesh and some parts of Central India. Resistance
to methomyl was monitored at all sites ( except Coimbatore ) during
'97-'99 seasons. Resistance appears to be gradually on the rise with
recent increase in use of this chemical for Helicoverpa control. Resistance
increases were similar to that of organophosphates, for example resistance
was moderate ( 31 - 40 %) in September, October and December but increased
later to 69% in February. Armes et al. (1996) report resistance levels
of 2 - 38 fold to methomyl in different parts of India, with highest
at 162 fold in Guntur. The carbamates can be used as a single spray
prior to the pyrethroid window.
IRM Strategies
Formulating resistance management strategies for Indian conditions
has been fairly complicated. The diversity and complexity of cotton
farmers, cultivation practices and cropping situations has always posed
a challenge. The strategies need to be uncomplicated, simple, robust,
available, affordable, compatible with current cropping practices, easy
to understand etc. Most IPM proponents would now agree that some of
the biological intervention components of cotton IPM have been tricky
due to their inconsistency in performance and importantly their non
- availability. Insecticides in most situations have usually been found
to be counterproductive due to resistance and resurgence problems. The
current strategies hence blend all crop production practices to incorporate
proper use of insecticides to ensure that each of these groups are applied
at such time of the cropping phase when 1. Resistance is low, 2. Natural
enemy populations are least disturbed and 3. Different groups of chemicals
are alternated.
Selection of cultivar for Central & South India
Recommended hybrids : NHH - 44, PKV Hy - 2, JK Hy - 1, JK Hy - 2, H
- 8, H - 10, Ankur - 651
Recommended varieties : LRA - 5166, Anjali, PKV - 081
Desi types : AKH - 4 , AKH - 8401
Selection of cultivar for North India.
Early maturing : F - 846, F - 1378, LH - 1556, F - 2054, H - 1098
Recommended hybrids : Omshankar, Fateh, Dhanalaxmi.
For CLCV prone areas: RS - 875, LHH - 144, Anjali, LRA - 5166, All
desi types ( LD 327, HD - 107, LD - 491)
Resistant / tolerant to Jassids : Bikaneri Narma, H - 777, RS - 875,
RST - 9, F - 5- 5, Fateh.
Cultivation Practices Optimised for Better Pest Management
-
Hybrids must be grown in medium - deep soils having
good drainage.
-
Early sowing on ridges and furrows, especially in
areas with drip facility, could be adopted.
-
Application of weedicide Stomp 30 EC or Basalin @
45 EC 2.5 lt / ha and harrow immediately to prevent degradation.
-
Harrowing must be done twice after pre - monsoon showers
and field should be levelled.
-
Prepare a good seed bed to ensure good plant stand.
-
Grow only arboretum cotton in CLCV hot - spot areas.
-
Only recommended varieties / hybrids from reliable
sources must be procured.
-
Apply 10 - 15 cartloads of well decomposed compost
or FYM / ha before sowing.
-
In North, sowing can be done at a row spacing of 67.5
cm with 30 cm plant - plant spacing or preferably wider for varieties
and 75 cm for hybrids. In South and Central zones sowing can be done
at a row spacing of 90 cm with 60 cm plant - plant spacing for hybrids,
60 x 30 cm for varieties and 45 x 20 for Desi cultivars.
-
Fertilizers should be applied @ NPK 60:30:30 for varieties
and 90:45:45 for hybrids under rainfed situation. For irrigated cotton
NPK should be applied at 90:45:45 for varieties and 120:60:60 kg /
ha for hybrids. Fertilizer should be given in three splits, the last
to be given before boll - set.
-
In Central and South India sowing must be completed
by the first week of July. In North India it is preferable to complete
sowing operations by the third week of May.
-
Gap filling must be completed within 10 days after
sowing.
-
Thinning should be done within 20 days after sowing.
-
First hoeing can be done 30 - 40 days after sowing
followed by second after 15 -20 days.
-
Cowpea can be sown either as bund crop or intercrop
and has been found source to natural enemies of sucking pests, which
also assist in keeping sucking pests of cotton in check.
-
Do not stack cotton stalks near fields.
-
Immediately after the season allow animal grazing
in fields and ensure timely removal and destruction of cotton stubbles,
followed by deep ploughing to expose the carry - over population of
bollworms.
-
Delint the seed with 100 ml sulphuric acid / kg seed
for two minutes, wash with water and soak for two minutes in sodium
bicarbonate (5g / ltr water).
-
Treat seeds with Ceresan wet or Agallol @ 1 g / ltr
water.
-
Treat seeds with Captan or carbendazim @ 2g / kg.
-
Destroy weeds such as Datura metel and Legascea mollis
near fields. These support Helicoverpa populations during off - season.
Destroy weeds such as Sida, Abutilon and Xanthium before sowing to
reduce CLCV incidence.
-
Avoid growing American cotton in orchards.
-
Avoid growing tur, moong and bhendi ( ladies finger
) in and around cotton field as these harbour insect pests.
-
Crushing of cotton seeds should be completed by end
of April, or fumigate seeds with celphos @ 3g / cubic meter.
-
Seed treatment ( Carbosulfan 50 g / kg seed ) also
helps in delaying the first spray ( Imidacloprid 7g / kg seed was
found useful for hybrids in protecting the crop against jassids upto
40 - 60 days ).
-
Grow sucking pest tolerant genotypes. It helps in
delaying the first spray, thus conserving the initial build - up of
natural enemies. Some Jassid tolerant cultivars need not be treated
with insecticides and are capable of protecting themselves from sucking
pests. It is possible to avoid spraying for at least two months for
some susceptible genotypes treated with Imidacloprid or carbosulfan.
-
Jassids and Aphids cause maximum damage during vegetative
period of the crop. But, populations of Lady bird beetles, Syrphids
and Chrysoperla carnea are also generally high and assist in reducing
the pest load.
-
Do not use broad spectrum insecticides such as phosphomidon,
dimethoate, monocrotophos, metasystox, acephate or any other insecticides
belonging to the organophosphate group, as they strongly disrupt natural
enemy populations. Avoidance of organophosphate insecticides for the
first three months helps in buid - up of entomophage populations such
as Chrysoperla, Campoletis chloridae, Microchilonis curvimaculatus,
Tachinids, Apanteles, Orius spp. And Podisus spp., bugs etc, which
contribute to the management of Helicoverpa.
-
Do not use any insecticide except NSKE + neem oil
or endosulfan ( as emergency option against jassids at 2 / leaf, and
aphids 50 / leaf ) against jassids or aphids within three months of
sowing. Helicoverpa incidence can be noticed in late vegetative phase
of the crop in some fields, but the infestation is very low and sporadic
and does not warrant intervention.
-
Spotted bollworm can cause damage to growing points
in Central and South India, but does not cause economic losses. However,
pink and spotted bollworms are important pests in north and need to
be managed. Set up pheromone traps @ 5 / ha for pink bollworm in North
India. Eight moths / trap / night for three consecutive nights is
the action threshold.
-
Do not use any unregistered compounds such as botanical
extracts, neem formulations etc. It is better to use neem oil or aqueous
extracts of 25 Kg neem seed kernel / ha, instead of any commercial
formulations.
-
Helicoverpa incidence starts in this period. Scouting
must be done in at least 50 plants per hectare.Thresholds of 25 larvae
/ 50 plants should be considered for spray of endosulfan.
-
Use of endosulfan should be encouraged only as early
season spray against Helicoverpa armigera as resistance levels have
been found to be invariably low early in the season. Edosulfan is
also relatively less toxic to natural enemies.
-
In North India, pyrethroids may be used as initial
sprays, if Helicoverpa egg population @ more than one egg per plant
is also noticed simultaneously along with an attack of spotted and
pink bollworms. It would be advisable to take up not more than one
application of pyrethorid before mid - September. Pyrethroids have
strong contact action on all lepidopteran moths; are effective on
younger larvae and are ineffective after mid - September due to increase
in resistance levels and also due to presence of all stages of larvae.
It is advisable to add 1 litre / ha of Sesamum oil to pyrethroids
as it helps in counteracting resistance. Sesamum oil should never
be mixed with any other group of insecticides.
-
Pyrethroids should be used only once. Synthetic pyrethroids
either as over dose or repeated sprays lead to excessive whitefly
flareup.
-
Set up pheronmote traps @ 5 / ha for H.armigera to
identify brood emergence.
-
It has been found useful to spray 2 % DAP at 80 -
90 days after sowing.
-
American bollworm causes maximum damage during peak
reproductive phase.
-
Resistance levels against certain organophosphate
group of insecticides (Quninalphos, Chlorpyriphos & Profenophos)
and carbamates such as thiodicarb have been found to be relatively
lower in most population tested. Hence, it is preferable to use these
as effective larvicides during mid - season (Aug - Sept for North
and Sept - Oct for Central and South India) based on ETLs (20 larvae
/ 20 plants ) when the situation warrants.
-
Pyrethroid resistance is high in many parts of India.
However, pyrethroids are still effective against spotted and pink
bollworm. In South and Central zones pyrethroids can be used after
second week of October to target Helicoverpa and a simultaneous initial
infestation of the pink bollworm.
-
Pink bollworm infestations are usually high during
November in South and Central zones, but are rarely noticed by farmers.
It is advisable to use one application of any pyrethroid at a threshold
level of 8 moths / trap./ night for the three consecutive nights in
pheromone traps. It must be remembered that pheromone septa need to
be changed once a fortnight.
-
In South and Central zones during outbreaks years,
Helicoverpa may persist till second week of November sometimes. Based
on thresholds of 20 larvae / 20 plants / acre, carbamate insecticides
such as Thiodicarb may be used during this period.
-
In Andhra Pradesh, egg batches of Spodoptera must
be handpicked. Light traps are very effective in Spodoptera management
and must be used. Other strategies such as SNPV can also be deployed
for effective management of Spodoptera.
-
Insecticides such as monocrotophos are not effective
against either Helicoverpa Spodoptera and must be avoided either alone
or as mixtures.
Some General Strategies of IRM
-
Handpicking of larvae 2 - 3 days after insecticide
sprays effectively eliminates any surviving population which can cause
future resistance problems.
-
Always use insecticides as need based applications
as per threshold levels. The keys to obtain better result from the
use of insecticide are:
-
Right time - use insecticides - only when the
need arises
-
Right chemical - choose - appropriate insecticide
-
Right dosage - use - only recommended dose
-
Right method - use - proper sprayers and spray
methods.
-
Always target younger stages of Helicoverpa as younger
stages of resistant larvae are known to get killed at normal recommended
doses.
-
Rotation of chemical groups helps in preventing the
build of resistance against most insecticides, especially carbamates,
organophosphates and endosulfan.
IRM Strategies for Cotton Pest Management -
North India
| |
May-June
|
July
|
August
|
September
|
October
|
November
|
| Insect Pest |
Jassids, Aphids
|
Jassids, Aphids Thrips |
Pink Bollworm, Whiteflies, Jassids |
Helicoverpa, Pink Bollworm, White Flies
|
Pink Bollworm, Helicoverpa |
Red Cottonbug |
| Economic Threshold
Level |
|
Jassid - 2/leaf Thrips-50/leaf
|
Whitefly-10 flies/leaf
Pink bollworm-5%damaged fruiting parts |
Helicoverpa 20 larvae/20plants |
10% damaged bolls |
|
| Manage ment options |
Grow jassid resistant genotypes |
Endosulfan (emerg. option)
|
Trochogramma/ HaNPV |
Endosulfan/ pyrethroid |
Quinalphos/ Chlorphyriphos |
Methomyl/ Thiodicarp |
|
| Crop Stage |
Vegetative |
Vegetative |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Bolls |
| Crop Age |
0-30 days |
30-60 days |
60-90 days |
90-120 days |
120-150 days |
150-180 days |
IRM Strategies for Cotton Pest Management -
Central and South India
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
July |
August |
September |
October |
November |
December |
| Insect Pest |
Jassids, Aphids |
Jassids, Aphids Thrips |
Helicoverpa, Whiteflies, Jassids |
Helicoverpa, White Flies |
Pink Bollworm |
Pink Bollworm,
Red Cottonbug |
| Economic Threshold Level |
|
Jassid -
2/leaf Thrips-50/leaf |
Helicoverpa 10 larvae/20plants |
Helicoverpa
20 larvae/20plants |
10% damaged
bolls |
|
| Manage ment options |
Imadacloprid as seed treatment for hybrids
Grow jassid resistant genotypes
|
Endosulfan or neem seed extract
|
HaNPV |
Endosulfan |
Quinalphos/ Chlorphyriphos/ profenofos |
Methomyl or thiodicarb |
Pyrethroid + sesamum oil |
| Crop Stage |
Vegetative |
Vegetative |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Squares & Flowering & Bolls |
Bolls |
| Crop Age |
0-30 days |
30-60 days |
60-90 days |
90-120 days |
120-150 days |
150-180 days |
Source : 1.
Sustainable Cotton pest management through IRM, CICR tech bull no.1/1999
2. Insecticide Resisitance management
(IRM) stategies for cotton pest, Directorate of Cotton Development,
Mumbai
|